Drug & Biologic Development

Approval, Labeling & Post-Approval Strategy

FDA strategy does not end with approval, and many post-approval issues are shaped by decisions made during review. Approved products generate continuing regulatory obligations and FDA-facing work that can directly affect patient access, product positioning, and long-term commercial value.

We provide senior FDA legal and regulatory strategy on post-approval matters where the regulatory, safety, labeling, and commercial stakes are highest. Where a matter calls for specialized operational or technical input, including pharmacovigilance operations, CMC, GMP, quality-system, or supply-chain expertise, we coordinate with the client's internal teams, consultants, or co-counsel.

We advise on:

  • Supplemental approvals, including sNDAs, sBLAs, and new indications
  • Postmarketing requirements and commitments (PMRs/PMCs), including modifications and FDA engagement
  • Accelerated approval post-approval obligations, including confirmatory study strategy and withdrawal risk
  • Labeling changes, including safety updates and labeling negotiations
  • REMS strategy, modifications, assessments, and FDA engagement
  • Drug shortage and discontinuance strategy, including 506C notifications
  • Safety signals, safety-reporting issues, and FDA safety communications

Selected Experience

  • Worked with brand sponsor on negotiating shared system REMS requirements, eligibility for a waiver, and implications of follow-on entrants.
  • Helped client address critical drug shortages, including communication with FDA, and requests for allowances and flexibility during such shortage.
  • Advised sponsor on post-approval strategy, including labeling updates, supplemental approvals for additional indications, manufacturing changes, and lifecycle planning around regulatory exclusivities.
Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. The matters described are illustrative of the attorney's experience, including from prior firms, and depend on the specific factual and legal circumstances of each engagement. Past results do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes in future matters.